Jan-Lennard Struff vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Apr at 06:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Struff vs M. Kecmanovic

GER
2
Win
Played
2
Win

SRB
2
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Struff 2 - 2 Kecmanovic
They have played 11 sets in total, with Jan-Lennard Struff winning 6 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 5. The last match between Miomir Kecmanovic and Jan-Lennard Struff was at the Estoril Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Struff | 2 |
| Kecmanovic | 2 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(R1) Estoril Challenger(04-30-25)
(R2) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-18-24)
(R1) Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel(10-21-19)
J. Struff vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,821,180 | Career Prize Money | $5,218,780 |
| 56.85% (602-457) | Career Total W/L | 55.98% (323-254) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 14 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 39.47% (15-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.15% (24-28) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
J. Struff vs M. Kecmanovic Match Preview:
Will Struff's second serve performance hold up against Kecmanovic? In the past six months, Struff has secured 46.42% of points on his second serve. Kecmanovic slightly edges him out with 48.38%, a statistic that often predicts match outcomes with surprising accuracy. Could this seemingly minor difference play a crucial role in determining the match winner?
The return game statistics offer more insights into each player's capabilities. Struff has claimed 47.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kecmanovic boasts a slightly better record of 48.81%. When it comes to returning first serves, Kecmanovic again surpasses Struff with a 24.01% win rate against Struff's 22.32%. Such data holds significant relevance in head-to-head match predictions, suggesting Kecmanovic might have a slight upper hand.
Under pressure, how do these players fare? Struff shines brighter here, saving 64.13% of breakpoints compared to Kecmanovic's 55.96%. This aspect becomes particularly valuable for in-game betting predictions when the tension rises to critical points. On broader terms, in the last year, Struff has managed to win 46.51% of his matches, while Kecmanovic holds a balanced 50% win record, providing a head-to-head prediction overview that maintains its openness.
Surface preference might guide us further in assessing these players. Both have shown their best performances on clay, each winning 61% of their matches on this surface. Both players mark grass as their least favorable surface, with Struff at 45% and Kecmanovic slightly better at 46%. The tour level they’ve played at also affects our prediction; in the past year, Struff has won 52.38% of his Main tour matches, marginally higher than Kecmanovic’s 51.72%. Such measures, while close, could hint at Struff's ability to slightly outperform in higher stakes.
When comparing them head-to-head, history reveals that Struff has won two of their three encounters, capturing six of the nine sets they've played. Yet, Kecmanovic emerged victorious in their most recent meeting, a grueling five-setter in Melbourne. Herein, Kecmanovic thrives under extreme pressure, winning both tiebreaks and the sole deciding set they've battled out. In recent matches, Struff has played against opponents with an average rank of 93.91, contrasting with Kecmanovic's average opponent rank of 77.48, showcasing Kecmanovic's experience against tougher competitors.
Finally, converting opportunities reveals Struff with a success rate of 30.21% in break point conversions versus Kecmanovic’s 28.17%. Such information is valuable when both players find themselves in these high-stakes moments. Given these comparative stats, while Kecmanovic demonstrates a slight edge in returning prowess and experience against top-tier players, Struff might counter this with his ability to save critical points and break when it counts. All considered, Kecmanovic may be slightly favored to emerge victorious in a potentially tight contest.
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Miomir Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Struff vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 58 | Games Won | 45 |
| 60 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:39:0 | Average Match Time | 1:39:0 |
| 65% (227/347) | 1st Serve % | 60% (193/322) |
| 76% (173/227) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (136/193) |
| 44% (53/120) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (66/129) |
| 46% (13/28) | Break Pts Won % | 23% (6/26) |
| 37% (120/322) | Return Points Win % | 35% (121/347) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Struff Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
Rubber 1 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | ||
F | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
SF | W | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
M. Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) | ||

J. Struff vs M. Kecmanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.85% (602/457) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.98% (323/254) |
| 55.42% (1447/1164) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.49% (776/648) |
| 52.30% (13354/12179) | Games Win/Loss | 51.95% (7111/6576) |
| 47.71% (104/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.18% (141/110) |
| 61.15% (277/176) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.19% (124/82) |
| 59.38% (190/130) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (40/40) |
| 45.59% (31/37) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 6953 | Aces Total | 2116 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 3133 | Total Double Faults | 1159 |
| 1:20:4 | Average Match Time | 1:40:57 |
| 463.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.85 |
| 56% (38041/67386) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25015/41358) |
| 75% (28663/38041) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17551/25015) |
| 51% (14838/29336) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8654/16338) |
| 39% (2290/5931) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1595/3907) |
| 37% (25429/68467) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16156/42193) |
| 51.00% (51/49) | Slam W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 54.01% (74/63) | Masters W/L | 40.22% (37/55) |
| 56.76% (21/16) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 47.79% (162/177) | Main Tour W/L | 54.09% (119/101) |
| 63.91% (193/109) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (58/35) |
| 70.71% (99/41) | Futures W/L | 72.63% (69/26) |
| 58% (559/969) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (288/512) |
| 44% (37/84) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 49% (238/483) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (115/248) |
| 49% (183/370) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (92/184) |
| 82% (598/493) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (342/277) |
| 18% (598/105) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (342/65) |
| 23% (461/108) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (235/46) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Veronika Podrez vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 3rd December 2025 Best Bets

Polona Hercog vs Oleksandra Oliynykova Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 3rd December 2025 Best Bets

Polina Kudermetova vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 3rd December 2025 Best Bets

Shuai Zhang vs Marina Bassols Ribera Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 3rd December 2025 Best Bets

Panna Udvardy vs Diletta Cherubini Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets
